Monday, September 1, 2025
Saturday, August 30, 2025
Monday, August 25, 2025
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
The Infinite Energy Source Made Possible By The Oil And Gas Industry
I've been saying for decades that we live on top of a massive ball of molten iron. About 84% of the Earth's volume is molten. I've argued that there is no shortage of energy, only that some forms of energy are more difficult to access.
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Monday, August 11, 2025
Why natural gas produces less CO2
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:15 AM Grant wrote:
Basically I agree, but I don't understand your comment on switching from coal to natural gas. Natural gas is very clean, but it still produces CO2, just not all the particulates. I think electricity production in Utah is almost entirely from coal fired plants, and coal reserves are projected to last about 1,000 years.
According to Google AI:
Natural gas produces less CO2 than other fossil fuels because it has a higher proportion of hydrogen relative to carbon. When burned, the hydrogen in natural gas combines with oxygen to form water (H2O), while the carbon combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide (CO2). Since natural gas has more hydrogen and less carbon, it produces less CO2 per unit of energy compared to fuels like coal or oil.
Sunday, August 10, 2025
Global Warming and Natural Feedbacks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlKxuabwHCg&t=1965s
The temperature data, which shows a very slow warming partly caused by human activity, has led me to believe that we are not in a climate crisis. It has taken 140 years for the average global atmospheric temperature to rise by 1 degree Celsius, and this follows the end of the Little Ice Age and the 1880s—one of the coldest periods in United States history that killed hundreds of Americans. Many more people die from cold than they do from heat.
My view is reinforced by what I see as questionable behavior from Climate Alarmists and the IPCC. Politicians and alarmists have created a moral hazard in which scientists risk losing funding if they do not support the official narrative. The IPCC reportedly refuses to hire anyone who does not already believe in catastrophic man-made warming, and the infamous email leak suggested they were trying to "hide the decline"—concealing that tree ring proxies used for reconstructing past temperatures were unreliable compared with recent data. People have quit the IPCC claiming that it is corrupt. One person claimed that the real goal of the IPCC was to do away with free market capitalism.
By the mid-2010s, it was evident that climate computer model predictions were running far too hot. This led to shifting target temperatures. Around 2010, I watched videos warning that by the year 2100, we were on track for a 3°C increase—considered dangerous—but that limiting the rise to 2°C would be manageable. Only a few years later, the claim shifted: we were supposedly on track for a 2°C rise—now deemed dangerous—and that limiting it to 1.5°C would be manageable. I remain unconvinced that half a degree would make a significant difference.
To me, climate alarmism appears to be driven more by politics than by reliable science. There has been a political shift where fewer people are taking it seriously. Reportedly, climate policy has cost trillions of dollars, so I think that this is the greatest scam in human history.
However, there are simply too many unknown variables. Most of the debate centers on the amount of positive feedback to warming. But since feedbacks can be both positive and negative, and since these processes are not fully understood, it is difficult to make reliable long-term predictions. The current major point of contention is cloud cover. Skeptics argue that increasing cloud cover would produce a net negative feedback—seemingly common sense—while the IPCC claims the opposite.
Although the United States has reduced its CO₂ emissions, largely by switching from coal to natural gas, China has tripled its emissions through massive coal plant construction. While China has paid lip service to fighting climate change, its actions suggest that they don't care.
It is also worth noting that we may run out of most fossil fuels by the year 2100. Current estimates suggest 40–50 years of oil reserves remain. Reportedly, the United States has a very large shale oil reserve that could last the United States 300 years, but most of it is so difficult to mine that it would cost $10 per gallon at the pump.
The temperature data, which shows a very slow warming partly caused by human activity, has led me to believe that we are not in a climate crisis. It has taken 140 years for the average global atmospheric temperature to rise by 1 degree Celsius, and this follows the end of the Little Ice Age and the 1880s—one of the coldest periods in United States history that killed hundreds of Americans. Many more people die from cold than they do from heat.
My view is reinforced by what I see as questionable behavior from Climate Alarmists and the IPCC. Politicians and alarmists have created a moral hazard in which scientists risk losing funding if they do not support the official narrative. The IPCC reportedly refuses to hire anyone who does not already believe in catastrophic man-made warming, and the infamous email leak suggested they were trying to "hide the decline"—concealing that tree ring proxies used for reconstructing past temperatures were unreliable compared with recent data. People have quit the IPCC claiming that it is corrupt. One person claimed that the real goal of the IPCC was to do away with free market capitalism.
By the mid-2010s, it was evident that climate computer model predictions were running far too hot. This led to shifting target temperatures. Around 2010, I watched videos warning that by the year 2100, we were on track for a 3°C increase—considered dangerous—but that limiting the rise to 2°C would be manageable. Only a few years later, the claim shifted: we were supposedly on track for a 2°C rise—now deemed dangerous—and that limiting it to 1.5°C would be manageable. I remain unconvinced that half a degree would make a significant difference.
To me, climate alarmism appears to be driven more by politics than by reliable science. There has been a political shift where fewer people are taking it seriously. Reportedly, climate policy has cost trillions of dollars, so I think that this is the greatest scam in human history.
However, there are simply too many unknown variables. Most of the debate centers on the amount of positive feedback to warming. But since feedbacks can be both positive and negative, and since these processes are not fully understood, it is difficult to make reliable long-term predictions. The current major point of contention is cloud cover. Skeptics argue that increasing cloud cover would produce a net negative feedback—seemingly common sense—while the IPCC claims the opposite.
Although the United States has reduced its CO₂ emissions, largely by switching from coal to natural gas, China has tripled its emissions through massive coal plant construction. While China has paid lip service to fighting climate change, its actions suggest that they don't care.
It is also worth noting that we may run out of most fossil fuels by the year 2100. Current estimates suggest 40–50 years of oil reserves remain. Reportedly, the United States has a very large shale oil reserve that could last the United States 300 years, but most of it is so difficult to mine that it would cost $10 per gallon at the pump.
Coal will last the longest, so we may eventually be forced to burn more of it.
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Saturday, August 2, 2025
There was NO first human
Scientists Discover Potential Cancer Cure in Ancient Tomb
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XfiWQKQ49Oo
I have heard that cancer cells are weaker than normal cells because of their constant replication. This makes them easier to kill, yet we still have not cured cancer. I believe it is likely that a cure could be found in my lifetime.
Microsoft Announces World's First Topological Quantum Chip
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9SBVZr3lbS0
I have always been skeptical of quantum computing. Some of the claims made about it don't seem to make sense, such as suggestions that quantum computers access physical dimensions we cannot see. Others even claim they do not fully understand how their quantum computers work.
I am sure quantum computing works to some degree, but there are practical limitations. The number of qubits that can be packed into a small space will likely always be restricted. Furthermore, many systems require cooling their circuits to near absolute zero, making them impractical for widespread use.
Friday, August 1, 2025
Wednesday, July 30, 2025
Monday, July 28, 2025
Sunday, July 27, 2025
Annual finance for climate action surpasses USD 1 trillion, but far from levels needed to avoid devastating future losses - CPI
https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/press-release/annual-finance-for-climate-action-surpasses-usd-1-trillion-but-far-from-levels-needed-to-avoid-devastating-future-losses/
According to Google:
Annual global climate finance flows reached almost $1.3 trillion in 2021/2022, doubling from 2019/2020 levels. However, this represents only about 1% of global GDP, and experts estimate that much larger investments are needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
Wednesday, July 23, 2025
Four Times a Day | John Harvey Kellogg
This is long, but very interesting.
Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Sunday, July 20, 2025
Friday, July 18, 2025
Why the Modern Diet Is Making You Sick
"Jordan Peterson continues to follow a carnivore diet, specifically a restricted version focusing on beef, salt, and water. He and his daughter, Mikhaila, have both spoken publicly about their experiences with this diet, citing improvements in various health issues like autoimmune conditions, depression, and sleep problems.
More Details:
- Peterson and his daughter follow a strict carnivore diet called the "lion diet," which limits their food intake to only beef, salt, and water.
- They believe this diet, which eliminates all other foods, can help with autoimmune conditions, mental health issues, and other health problems.
- Peterson has reported experiencing positive impacts, such as reduced inflammation, improved gum health, and increased strength, since adopting the diet.
- The diet has faced criticism and concern from some experts, who point to potential health risks like nutrient deficiencies and the difficulty of maintaining such a restrictive diet long-term.
- While Peterson and his daughter have shared their experiences, they have also emphasized that they don't recommend this diet for everyone. "
When it comes to poor health, we could blame diet, excess weight, or a combination of the two. People gain weight because they consume more calories than they burn. Eating too many carbohydrates can contribute to this, but that doesn't mean we should eliminate them entirely.
I've also seen a number of videos claiming that humans are carnivores. That's simply not accurate. Only a few species are obligate carnivores that can survive on meat alone. Humans are omnivores; we have teeth and digestive systems adapted to a varied diet.
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
Saturday, July 12, 2025
Thursday, July 10, 2025
The Star that will Enter the Solar System
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix4HX62YH4o&t=389s
Hundreds of billions of stars are orbiting the Milky Way. Sometimes they get close to each other.
I assume that the orbits don't have to be perfectly circular. Reportedly, other stars have passed close to the solar system.
Wednesday, July 9, 2025
Today may be shortest day ever
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 12:18 PM Larry wrote:
>> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14885815/Shortest-day-history-TOMORROW-Earths-rotation.html
A solar day is different from one complete rotation. A solar day is the time that elapses from high noon to high noon. But in a day, the Earth moves about 1 degree around the sun. That means that high noon is about 1 degree different from one day to the next.
If we measure by the stars, a full rotation, called a sidereal day, takes 23 hours and 56 minutes.
Saturday, July 5, 2025
Policing London | British History
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9BYIz0iiV0&t=2309s
According to the video, early attempts at policing were corrupt and cruel, and legislatures didn't want to pay for them.
The British model spread to other countries.
Friday, July 4, 2025
Wednesday, July 2, 2025
Saturday, June 28, 2025
I never understood why matter curves spacetime...until now!
1 minute ago
To be a valid theory, Relativity would have to be able to define the 4D shape of space-time. Does the theory do this, or does it just assume that space-time is curved?
My problem with "space-time" is that it equates and combines two things that are not the same at all. It assumes that the progress of time is like physical motion through space. People say that we are moving through space-time at the speed of light.
Time is the interval between sequential events. It is not a distance we travel.
Since we know that there is a cosmic speed limit, time dilation is a physical consequence of approaching that speed limit.
There is much explained by Relativity. Could there be another model that doesn't involve the concept of "space-time"? What if Gravity really is a force?
Physicists Debunk Net Zero: No Dangerous Warming from CO₂
The whole video is interesting, but please give it at least 11 minutes.
Friday, June 27, 2025
Tuesday, June 24, 2025
Sunday, June 22, 2025
Scientists Discover Gene For Surviving on 4 Hours Sleep
https://youtube.com/shorts/deUxZd-RboI?si=mxVzmiW9SQ4XvpVE
I have trouble getting more than six hours sleep, however, sometimes I can sleep longer.
I have trouble getting more than six hours sleep, however, sometimes I can sleep longer.
Saturday, June 21, 2025
11 foods to avoid???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgdTUwLmh6g&t=28s
I haven't had time to research all of his recommendations, although I will try to look into them.
His first recommendation is to avoid spinach and almonds because they are high in oxalates. I had no idea what oxalates are, but here is what Google AI says about them:
For most people, oxalates found in everyday foods are not dangerous and are part of a healthy, balanced diet. However, there are certain situations where elevated oxalate levels can cause issues.
In what cases can oxalates be dangerous?
- Kidney stones: Oxalates, also known as oxalic acid, are naturally occurring compounds in plants that can bind with calcium in the urine, forming calcium oxalate crystals. These crystals can develop into painful kidney stones. For individuals prone to kidney stones or with a family history of them, a doctor may recommend a low-oxalate diet to reduce their risk.
- Oxalosis: In severe cases of high oxalate levels, a condition called oxalosis can develop, where oxalate builds up in organs and tissues throughout the body, potentially damaging bones, blood vessels, eyes, and even the heart. This can happen if kidneys aren't effectively removing oxalate from the blood due to primary or enteric hyperoxaluria.
- Impaired nutrient absorption: Oxalates can bind with minerals like calcium and magnesium in the gut, reducing their absorption. However, this is usually not a significant concern for most people who consume a varied diet with adequate calcium intake.
- Specific health conditions: Individuals with certain conditions like primary hyperoxaluria (a rare genetic disorder), enteric hyperoxaluria (due to certain intestinal problems), or those who have had weight-loss surgery may need to monitor their oxalate intake more closely as they are at a higher risk of hyperoxaluria and related complications.
What are symptoms of high oxalates?
Symptoms of high oxalate levels (hyperoxaluria) or oxalate sensitivity can vary, but may include:
- Kidney stones: Symptoms like sharp pain in the back, side, lower belly or groin, blood in the urine, painful urination, and frequent urge to urinate.
- Joint pain and inflammation: Oxalate crystals can deposit in joints, leading to swelling, pain, and stiffness.
- Digestive issues: Abdominal pain, bloating, gas, diarrhea, or constipation.
- Neurological symptoms: Tingling or numbness, muscle weakness, and in rare cases, seizures or difficulty with coordination.
- Eye and skin issues: Burning or itching in the eyes, redness, sensitivity to light, and potentially skin rashes or crystals on the skin.
What to do if you suspect you have high oxalates?
If you are concerned about your oxalate levels or have any of the associated symptoms, it is important to consult with a healthcare provider. They can perform necessary tests, like a 24-hour urine collection, to determine if you have hyperoxaluria and recommend appropriate dietary or medical interventions.
In summary, while oxalates can pose health risks in certain individuals, they are generally not dangerous for the majority of people when consumed as part of a balanced diet.
Foods high in oxalates include spinach, rhubarb, almonds, beets, and certain soy products. Other foods with high oxalate content include Swiss chard, star fruit, cocoa, bran cereals, and some nuts and seeds.
Foods Specifically Mentioned as High in Oxalates:
- .Spinach, Swiss chard, and beet greens are known for their high oxalate content.
- .Rhubarb, star fruit, raspberries, dates, and kiwi are also high in oxalates.
- .Almonds, cashews, and peanuts are among the nuts with higher oxalate levels.
- .Tofu, soy milk, and other foods derived from soybeans can be high in oxalates.
- .Buckwheat, bran, and some wheat products can also contribute to oxalate intake.
- .Cocoa, chocolate, and some beverages like black tea and soy milk are also sources of oxalates.
Important Considerations:
- While some foods are high in oxalates, it's not necessary to eliminate them entirely from your diet. A guide from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests that careful planning and balanced portion sizes can allow you to enjoy these foods.
- The impact of oxalates can vary depending on individual factors, such as kidney health. Consult with a doctor or dietitian for personalized dietary recommendations.
- Increasing calcium intake, particularly from dairy products, can help bind to oxalates in the digestive system, potentially reducing their absorption.
Friday, June 20, 2025
Dads
P.S. I recently read that the average cloud weighs a million pounds. Clouds are made up of water vapor, water droplets and ice crystals so small that they are like dust and can float on the wind.
Seed Oils: The Raging Debate
Also look at this chart:
Canola Oil has a ratio of 2:1 Omega-6 to Omega-3.
Olive Oil has a ratio of 10:1.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/86wXE62t27U
-
I've been saying for decades that we live on top of a massive ball of molten iron. About 84% of the Earth's volume is molten. I'...
-
P.S. I recently read that the average cloud weighs a million pounds. Clouds are made up of water vapor, water droplets and ice crystals so...
